Who would win in a WAR

 Yahoo Answer Fails -> yahoo linked

Who would win in a war..?
USA and Russia vs All
USA vs Canada
Canada vs Mexico
Germany vs Australia
Isreal vs Iraq
UK vs USA
Russia vs All (Discluding US)
US vs All (Discluding Russia)

Right the country and a short reason.

Best Answer

USA and Russia vs Ali? Nobody can beat Muhammad Ali.

USA vs Canada, you think Canada is a real country or something, it's United States Junior. Sure it's a british commonwealth, but Britain is United States Jr. too. So Canada would be United States the 3rd. If Congress passed a law annexing Canada, there would be nothing the Canadians could do about it. Also, Canadians talk like Americans do, not like British. And the US is even better than Canada at hockey, while the British don't even play hockey, they play cricket. And Canada plays much closer to American football than British football.

Canada vs Mexico, the US wouldn't allow that to happen. They'd each have to stand at their border with the US and yell insults from 4000 miles away. Mexico would have the advantage, being the world's leading experts on sneaking across borders, but when they got to Canada, they would just get jobs.

In what crazy universe could Germany possibly go to war with Australia... they haven't had a decent navy in almost 100 years. Why would they even want to attack Australia, Australia has nothing but a giant desert, lots of sheep, and a serious kangaroo overpopulation problem. Attacking Australia is almost as nuts as attacking the Gobi Desert.

Israel vs Iraq would provoke all the Arab and Shiite countries to attack Israel, since Iraq is both Arab and Persian, it would be a serious mistake for Israel, it would be crushed.

The USA would easily defeat the UK. The only reason to have the fight would be that the first one wasn't fair, since the French intervened, and because the war of 1812 was inconclusive. Both have nukes, but the US has more, and it has missile subs too. Just a few nukes lobbed over Britain would wipe it out in 5 minutes, and there would be no retaliation. USA big, Britain little.

Russia vs All depends on who is doing the invading. Russia might be able to capture back the USSR, but they can't take on the world offensively until the arctic ice cap melts, at which point they will have over half of the world's oil reserves since they claimed the sea floor there. On the other hand, if all the countries on Earth formed a massive army and marched it into Russia, they would be marching to a doom of freezing and starvation. Even if the United States was involved. One of history's most important lessons is, don't invade Russia. The last people to successfully invade Russia were the Russians, and they came from Norway originally, but modern Norway probably couldn't even win a war against Estonia let alone Russia. Invading Russia should be considered a method of suicide.

US vs All is one that might actually happen, if the US gets another fascist president. I hate to have to tell you this, but even without the Russians selling the world's best fighter planes to the All side, the US would have no chance because the All side has most of the oil. If the entire world were at war with the USA, it would naturally embargo all the crude oil. And the US military can't operate without petroleum. About 2/3 of America's crude oil used is produced in North America, that's the oil industry slogan, but that includes Canada, Mexico and Central America, so it wouldn't all be available. And even if it were, losing that other 1/3 would be a death blow to the US economy. 300 million vs 7 billion is hopeless odds.

Now I've got one for you, who would win a war between the American Legion and the Foreign Legion? Assuming of course they could get across the ocean on their triremes and quadriremes.